Lee v. City of South Charleston et al.
Plaintiff: Ivan H. Lee, II
Defendant: City of South Charleston, Frank A. Mullens, Jr., Brad L. Rinehart, Bobby Yeager, D.J. Pauley, John Doe, John Noe and John Roe
Case Number: 2:2008cv00289
Filed: May 2, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia
Office: Civil Rights: Other Office
County: Kanawha
Presiding Judge: John T. Copenhaver, Jr.
Presiding Judge:
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 28, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 89 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting defendants' 81 SUPPLEMENTAL MOTION for Summary Judgment to the extent defendants seek the dismissal of (1) Lee's claims against defendant Yeager; (2) Lee's false arrest claim; and (3) Lee's claims against defendant officers Roe, Noe and Doe; and it is otherwise denied; directing that defendants Roe, Noe, and Doe are dismissed from this action without prejudice; further directing that defendant Yeager be dismissed from this action with p rejudice; further directing that Lee's false arrest claim be dismissed. Signed by Judge John T. Copenhaver, Jr. on 10/28/2009. (cc: attys; any unrepresented parties) (mkw) (Modified on 10/30/2009 to correctly reflect defendant Yeager dismissed with prejudice) (skh).
August 28, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 70 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting defendants' 47 MOTION to exceed the page limit; granting defendants' 48 MOTION for Summary Judgment to the extent the defendants seek dismissal of plaintiff's Section 1983 equal protection clai m, plaintiff's remaining Section 1983 claims against the City of South Charleston, Mayor Mullens and Chief of Police Rinehart, and plaintiff's claim of intentional infliction of emotional distress; and otherwise denying said motion; directing that the City of South Charleston, Mayor Mullens and Chief of Police Rinehart are dismissed from this action. Signed by Judge John T. Copenhaver, Jr. on 8/28/2009. (cc: attys) (taq)
August 21, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 66 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 14 MOTION to Dismiss. The Court orders that Plaintiff's section 1983 claims be dismissed as to Officers Pauley and Yeager in their official capacities only, and that the Plaintiff's claims of intentional infliction of emotional distress, assault, battery, and false arrest be dismissed as to the City of South Charleston. Signed by Judge John T. Copenhaver, Jr. on 8/21/2009. (cc: attys) (gan)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the West Virginia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lee v. City of South Charleston et al.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ivan H. Lee, II
Represented By: Kevin B. Burgess
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: City of South Charleston
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Frank A. Mullens, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Brad L. Rinehart
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bobby Yeager
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: D.J. Pauley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Doe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Noe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Roe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?