LaRue v. Matheney et al
William Allen LaRue |
Russell Matheney and Christy Flores |
2:2008cv00983 |
August 11, 2008 |
US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
Prisoner: Civil Rights Office |
Fayette |
David A. Faber |
Mary E. Stanley |
Plaintiff |
Federal Question |
42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 140 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER confirming and accepting the 11 and 22 Proposed Findings and Recommendation; overruling plaintiff's 26 Objections; denying plaintiff's 27 , 39 , 40 , 45 , 46 , 48 , 49 , 60 , 76 , 78 , 83 , 84 , 85 , 86 , 87 , 88 , 91 , 94 , 95 , 98 , 121 , 130 and 132 Motions; and dismissing this suit pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1915A for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. The Clerk is directed to remove this action from the court's active docket. Signed by Judge David A. Faber on 3/4/2010. (cc: plaintiff, pro se; attys) (taq) |
Filing 22 PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION (recommending that this civil action be dismissed with prejudice, and that plaintiff's 2 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction, 4 MOTION for a Permanent Restraining Order, 5 MOTION for an Order Compelling t he defendants to Abstain from Imposing Punishment and 6 MOTION to Compel be denied with prejudice); noting that plaintiff paid $150.00 toward his filing fee and if this action is dismissed, it is suggested that the Clerk refund $150.00 to Plaintiff. Objections to Proposed F&R due by 3/20/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mary E. Stanley on 3/5/2009. (cc: plaintiff) (taq) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.