CLARK et al v. ACTAVIS GROUP HF et al
| Kevin Clark and Willie Mae Wilburn |
| ACTAVIS GROUP HF, Actavis Totowa, LLC, ACTAVIS INC., Actavis Elizabeth, LLC, Actavis US, Mylan, Inc., Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Mylan Laboratories, Inc., MYLAN BERTEK PHARMACEUTICALS INC., UDL Laboratories, Inc. and ACTAVIS GROUP PTC, ehf |
| JOSEPH J. NOVAK |
| United States |
| 2:2008cv01017 |
| August 26, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Joseph R. Goodwin |
| Both |
| Diversity |
| 28:1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
64
PRETRIAL ORDER #60 (Memorandum Opinion and Order re Motion for Class Certification) Denying 56 MOTION by Willie Mae Wilburn (WVSD CA 2:08-1017), Lorena Ard (WVSD CA 2:09-0544), Dale Campbell (WVSD CA 2:08-01075), Alan Chambers (WVSD CA 2:08-1175), Peter J. Konek (WVSD CA 2:08-01053), William E. Lange (WVSD CA 2:09-0448), and Judy A. Whitaker (WVSD CA 2:09-0544), as Executrix of the Estate of Anna Fight (WVSD CA 2:09-0544), for Class Certification. Signed by Judge Joseph R. Goodwin on 5/25/2010. (cc: Clerk of the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation; attys) (REF: ALL CASES) (ras)
|
|
Filing
52
CONSENT TO DISMISS WITHOUT PREJUDICE: Pursuant to FRCvP 41, the claims of Plaintiff Kevin Clark are dismissed in their entirety without prejudice. Signed by Judge Joseph R. Goodwin on 8/14/2009. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (ras)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
