Wolfe v. Green et al
| Roger Wolfe |
| Paul A. Green, Jason S. Crane, J. K. Rapp, Kristy L. Layne, D. L. Lemmon, West Virginia State Police, Jason A. Tackett, Emergency Medicine Physicians of Kanawha County, PLLC and John Does 1 - 3 |
| 2:2008cv01023 |
| August 25, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
| Civil Rights: Other Office |
| Kanawha |
| John T. Copenhaver, Jr. |
| Both |
| Federal Question |
| 28:1446 Petition for Removal |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
277
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER directing as follows: granting the parties' 271 JOINT MOTION to redact certain pleadings; the original copies of Exhibit 1 to plaintiff's fee petition (filed on 12/18/2009), Trooper Green's response submi ssions (filed on 02/05/2010), and Exhibit 2 to plaintiff's reply memorandum (filed on 3/12/2010) remain filed under seal; the redacted versions of the aforementioned documents remain on the public docket for inspection by any interested parties. Signed by Judge John T. Copenhaver, Jr. on 12/15/2010. (cc: attys; any unrepresented parties) (mkw)
|
|
Filing
266
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Awarding plaintiff Roger Wolfe a total of $152,926.65 in fees, $30,867.53 in costs, and $46,971.82 in expenses, resulting in a total award of $230,766.00. Signed by Judge John T. Copenhaver, Jr. on 9/24/2010. (cc: attys; any unrepresented parties) (mkw)
|
|
Filing
224
ENTRY OF JUDGMENT BY CLERK PURSUANT TO RULE 68, FRCivP: Entering judgment in favor of Plaintiff Roger Wolfe against Defendants Paul A. Green, Jason S. Crane, J. K. Rapp, Kristy L. Layne, D. L. Lemmon, and the West Virginia State Police in the total a mount of $200,001.01 and fees and expenses to be determined by the Court as set forth in the Offer of Judgment attached to the 222 Notice of Acceptance of Offer of Judgment; to the extent that John Does 1-3 are later determined to be employees of the West Virginia State Police, this Judgment includes them as well. Signed by Teresa L. Deppner, Clerk of Court, on 10/7/2009. (certified cc: attys) (ras)
|
|
Filing
91
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying plaintiff's 11 MOTION to Remand to Circuit Court of Kanawha County. Signed by Judge John T. Copenhaver, Jr. on 4/9/2009. (cc: attys) (mkw)
|
|
Filing
90
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting plaintiff's 67 MOTION to Compel, directing defendant to answer Interrogatory No. 7, and produce the documents sought by Request Nos. 10, 14, 15, and 29 within two weeks of the entry of this Order; the part ies to execute and submit for entry the form protective order found on the court's website to prevent inappropriate dissemination of the documents; as to Request No. 15, noting that the request for "all documents concerning allegations of abuse perpetrated by troopers in connection with their duties with West Virginia State Police during the last ten years" is vague, directing the parties to discuss and attempt to reach agreement on the data that will be produced; plaintiff may f ile an affidavit seeking reasonable expenses incurred in making the motion, including attorney's fees; defendant's response to the affidavit to be filed within five business days of the filing of the affidavit and to include an identification of the party or attorney whose conduct or advice necessitated the motion; and as directed and set forth more fully herein. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mary E. Stanley on 4/2/2009. (cc: attys) (taq)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
