National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA v. Lambert et al
| National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA |
| Ezra Lambert and Betty Jean Hale |
| 2:2008cv01158 |
| October 7, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
| Charleston Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Joseph R. Goodwin |
| Mary E. Stanley |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgment |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
89
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER denying defendant Ezra Lambert's 81 MOTION to Alter or Amend the Court's 04/26/2010 Order Dismissing Defendant Lambert's Counterclaim and 82 MOTION for Leave to Amend Counterclaim. Signed by Judge Joseph R. Goodwin on 6/14/2010. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (mkw)
|
|
Filing
72
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER DISMISSING defendant Ezra Lambert's 17 Counterclaim; to the extent that the counterclaim requests compensation for the guardian ad litem, this request has already been denied in this court's 04/23/2009 Order; REFERRING Mr. Lambert's 71 MOTION for costs, attorneys fees, and expenses to the Honorable Mary E. Stanley, United States Magistrate Judge. Signed by Judge Joseph R. Goodwin on 4/26/2010. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (mkw)
|
|
Filing
69
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER denying 64 MOTION by National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA for Summary Judgment; granting 66 MOTION by Betty Jean Hale for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Joseph R. Goodwin on 4/19/2010. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (skh)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
