Hays v. Town of Gauley Bridge, West Virginia
Rodney E. Hays |
Town of Gauley Bridge West Virginia |
2:2009cv01272 |
November 20, 2009 |
US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
Charleston Office |
Kanawha |
John T. Copenhaver, Jr. |
Mary E. Stanley |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 139 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting defendants' 130 MOTION to enforce to the extent that defendants are entitled to costs to be determined by the Clerk as earlier set forth herein and denied as to its residue; granting defendants'[1 34] MOTION to Seal Exhibit A; denying plaintiff's 132 MOTION for Sanctions; terminating the 88 MOTION to reinstate this case to the active docket and 95 MOTION in Limine. Signed by Judge John T. Copenhaver, Jr. on 3/19/2012. (cc: plaintiff; attys; any unrepresented parties) (taq) |
Filing 75 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER adopting and incorporating the 72 Proposed Findings and Recommendation herein to the extent consistent with the foregoing discussion and not adopted in any other respect; granting the 55 Motion for Summary Judgm ent filed by the defendant Town of Gauley Bridge, West Virginia, to the extent consistent with the foregoing discussion and denied in all other respects; and granting the 63 Motion to dismiss the amended complaint or, in the alternative, for summary judgment filed by defendants Municipal Judge William Kincaid, Chief Sean Whipkey, and Officers Charles Burkhamer and Heath Whipkey to the extent consistent with the foregoing discussion and denied in all other respects.Signed by Judge John T. Copenhaver, Jr. on 3/29/2011. (cc: pro se plaintiff; attys; United States Magistrate Judge) (taq) |
Filing 72 PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION recommending that the individual defendants' 63 MOTION to Dismiss Amended Complaint or Alternative Motion for Summary Judgment be granted in part and denied in part; that defendants' 55 MOTION for Pa rtial Summary Judgment on Liability and Summary Judgment on Claims for Damages Other Than Nominal Damages be granted in part and denied in part. Objections to Proposed F&R due by 3/7/2011. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mary E. Stanley on 2/16/2011. (cc: Plaintiff; attys) (tmh) |
Filing 31 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER adopting the 18 Proposed Findings and Recommendation in its entirety; granting defendant's 6 Motion to Dismiss as to plaintiffs claim pursuant to section 241 and denied in all other respects; denying plaintiff 39;s 8 Motion for default judgment; and this action is referred anew to the magistrate judge pursuant to the terms of the 2 standing order. Signed by Judge John T. Copenhaver, Jr. on 5/6/2010. (cc: pro se plaintiff; attys; United States Magistrate Judge) (taq) (Modified on 5/7/201 the action on defendant's #6 motion to granting as to claim Modified on 5/7/2010 (skh). |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Hays v. Town of Gauley Bridge, West Virginia | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Rodney E. Hays | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Town of Gauley Bridge West Virginia | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.