Parkins-White v. Citibank South Dakota N.A.
Shannon Parkins-White |
Citibank South Dakota N.A. |
2:2010cv00104 |
February 1, 2010 |
US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
Charleston Office |
Mingo |
Joseph R. Goodwin |
Consumer Credit |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting the defendant's 10 MOTION to Consider Out of Time 9 Response to Motion for Remand; and denying the plaintiff's 4 MOTION to Remand. Signed by Judge Joseph R. Goodwin on 3/18/2010. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (taq) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Parkins-White v. Citibank South Dakota N.A. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Shannon Parkins-White | |
Represented By: | Wesley Harrison White |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Citibank South Dakota N.A. | |
Represented By: | Danielle M. Waltz |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.