West Virginia Laborers' Pension Trust Fund et al v. Owens Pipeline Service, LLC et al
| Pipeline Laborers' Employers Cooperation and Education Trust, West Virginia Laborers' Pension Trust Fund, West Virginia Laborers' Trust Fund, West Virginia Laborers' Profit Sharing Plan Trust Fund, West Virginia Laborers' Training Trust Fund, West Virginia Laborers' Employers Cooperation and Education Trust, West Virginia Laborers' Local No. 543 and Laborers-Employers Benefit Plan Collection Trust |
| Owens Pipeline Service, LLC and Paul Owens |
| 2:2010cv00131 |
| February 8, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
| Charleston Office |
| Kanawha |
| Joseph R. Goodwin |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
44
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER directing that the West Virginia Laborers' Pension Trust Fund, Trust Fund, Profit Sharing Plan Trust Fund and Training Trust Fund's 38 MOTION for Summary Judgment is granted in part as to employer contributi ons and denied in part as to employees' deductions for union dues, and the 40 CROSS-MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Paul Owens is denied. The parties are requested to compute the appropriate pre-judgment penalties and interest as to the employer contributions and to submit a proposed Judgment Order to the Court for entry. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mary E. Stanley on 11/18/2011. (cc: attys) (lca)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
