Eads v. Wexford Health Sources et al
| Jonathan D. Eads |
| David Ballard, Wexford Health Sources, Suhbash Gajendragakar, David Proctor, Tristan Tenney, Adrian Hoke and Jim Rubenstein |
| 2:2010cv00136 |
| February 10, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
| Charleston Office |
| Fayette |
| Joseph R. Goodwin |
| Mary E. Stanley |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
52
ORDER accepting and incorporating the 51 Proposed Findings and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge; dismissing this action without prejudice, denying without prejudice the Wexford defendants' 45 Motion to Dismiss and directing that this action be removed from the docket. Signed by Judge Joseph R. Goodwin on 7/21/2011. (cc: pro se plaintiff; attys; any unrepresented party) (taq)
|
|
Filing
48
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER adopting and incorporating the 41 Proposed Findings and Recommendation; granting defendants Ballard, Hoke, and Rubenstein's 26 MOTION to Dismiss, and the court DISMISSES the claims against defendants Rosencran ce and Sotak pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A; the Clerk should terminate defendants Ballard, Hoke, Rubenstein, Rosencrance, and Sotak from this action; denying defendants Wexford Health Sources, Inc., Gajendragadkar, Proctor, and Tenny's 28 MOTION to Dismiss, and the court DENIES the plaintiff's request for injunctive relief. Signed by Judge Joseph R. Goodwin on 2/24/2011. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (mkw)
|
|
Filing
41
PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION (recommending that the presiding District Judge GRANT the 26 Motion by David Ballard, Adrian Hoke and Jim Rubenstein to Dismiss; DISMISS the allegations in the Amended Complaint against defendants Grover Rosencr ance and Charlene Sotak; DENY the 28 MOTION by Suhbash Gajendragakar, David Proctor, Tristan Tenney, Wexford Health Sources to Dismiss Complaint and leave this matter referred to the undersigned United States Magistrate Judge for additional proceed ings concerning the claims in the Amended Complaint against those defendants and defendants Dameff and Lauder and deny Plaintiff's request for injunctive relief, without prejudice); Objections to Proposed F&R due by 2/14/2011. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mary E. Stanley on 1/28/2011. (cc: Plaintiff, attys) (tmh) (Modified on 1/31/2011 to add text regarding the #26 motion and the allegations in the amended complaint against Rosencrance and Sotak) (skh).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
