Bayer CropScience LP v. Central West Virginia Energy, Inc.
Bayer CropScience LP |
Central West Virginia Energy, Inc. |
2:2010cv00348 |
March 17, 2010 |
US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
Charleston Office |
Joseph R. Goodwin |
Contract: Other |
09 U.S.C. ยง 1 U.S. Arbitration Act |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 22 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting plaintiff's 11 MOTION for Summary Judgment to enforce the arbitration award; and denying the defendant's 18 CROSS-MOTION for Summary Judgment to Vacate Portion of Arbitration Award. Signed by Judge Joseph R. Goodwin on 8/6/2010. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (taq) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Bayer CropScience LP v. Central West Virginia Energy, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Bayer CropScience LP | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Central West Virginia Energy, Inc. | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.