Daniels v. Russell et al
| Candina Daniels |
| Antonio Russell, Oxford House, Inc. and John Doe |
| 2:2010cv00539 |
| April 21, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
| Charleston Office |
| Kanawha |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
71
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying as moot defendant Oxford House, Inc.'s 53 MOTION to Strike Exhibits A through E attached to plaintiffs' summary judgment response; granting defendant Oxford House, Inc.'s 38 MOTION for Summa ry Judgment to the extent that it seeks a determination as a matter of law that Oxford House is not vicariously liable for the intentional torts perpetrated upon plaintiffs by Russell and denied is all other respects. Signed by Judge John T. Copenhaver, Jr. on 5/3/2011. (cc: attys and to Ms. Winkler at the following addresses, by certified mail return receipt requested: P.O. Box 43 1105, Alum Creek, WV 25003 and 9th Street Apt. 2, Huntington, WV 25701) (mkw)
|
|
Filing
18
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER directing that civil actions 2:10-0539, 2:10-540, 2:10-0541 and 2:10-0542 are consolidated for purposes of pretrial development and conferencing; the court reserves the question of consolidation of the cases for trial pen ding a discussion of that matter at the pretrial conference following discovery; the Daniels case is designated as the lead action; all further filing shall be captioned and docketed in that case; the court will enter a consolidated scheduling oreder this same day that will set a single trial date; if it is ultimately determined that the cases should not be consolidated for trial, the court, in consultation with counsel, will select the first action for trial, which will proceed according to the trial date set in the scheduling order; the remaining three actions will then be set for trial as expeditiously as possible thereafter. Signed by Judge John T. Copenhaver, Jr. on 8/12/2010. (cc: attys; any unrepresented parties) (mkw)
|
|
Filing
14
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying the 8 MOTION to Strike; counsel are directed to file a Joint Rule 26(f) report addressing the desirability of coordinated treatment or consolidation of the four civil actions by 8/6/2010; denying without prejudice the 3 MOTION to Dismiss; granting the 7 MOTION to Amend the complaint; and the proposed amended complaint is filed today. Signed by Judge John T. Copenhaver, Jr. on 7/28/2010. (cc: attys; any unrepresented parties) (taq)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
