Simpson v. Plants
Cory Simpson |
Mark Plants |
2:2010cv00580 |
April 23, 2010 |
US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
Charleston Office |
Kanawha |
Other |
77 U.S.C. ยง 7777 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying plaintiff's 8 Appeal of the Magistrate Judge's Order Denying the Plaintiff's Motion to Proceed Without Prepayment of Costs; directing Plaintiff to pay the $350 filing fee, in full, for each c ase in which he wishes to pursue by 11/22/2010; this court will dismiss any case as to which the complete filing fee is not received by that date. Signed by Judge Joseph R. Goodwin on 10/21/2010. (cc: Magistrate Judge Stanley, attys, and any unrepresented party) (mkw) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Simpson v. Plants | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Cory Simpson | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Mark Plants | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.