Boggs v. Fola Coal Company, LLC
David Boggs |
Fola Coal Company, LLC |
2:2010cv00608 |
April 23, 2010 |
US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
Charleston Office |
Kanawha |
Other |
77 U.S.C. ยง 7777 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 29 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting defendant's 24 MOTION for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge John T. Copenhaver, Jr. on 3/4/2011. (cc: attys; any unrepresented parties) (taq) |
Filing 14 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying plaintiff's 5 MOTION to Remand to Circuit Court of Clay County. Signed by Judge John T. Copenhaver, Jr. on 9/7/2010. (cc: attys; any unrepresented parties) (mkw) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Boggs v. Fola Coal Company, LLC | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: David Boggs | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Fola Coal Company, LLC | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.