Harper v. Haupt

Plaintiff: Robert R. Harper
Defendant: Bruce F. Haupt
Case Number: 2:2010cv01273
Filed: November 1, 2010
Court: West Virginia Southern District Court
Office: Charleston Office
County: Kanawha
Nature of Suit: Other
Cause of Action: 77:7777
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
February 9, 2011 25 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying Cleveland Clinic's 11 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction; and denying Cleveland Clinic's 14 MOTION for Transfer of Venue; noting that defendants Bruce F. Haupt, M.D. and Moun tain Pride Orthopaedics, PLLC, were dismissed by the state court prior to removal, dismissing said defendants from this action; directing the Clerk to terminate both defendants from the docket sheet. Signed by Judge Joseph R. Goodwin on 2/9/2011. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (taq)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the West Virginia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Harper v. Haupt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Robert R. Harper
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bruce F. Haupt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.