Gilco v. Hunter et al
| Jeananne Gilco |
| Logan County Home Confinement Department, John Reed, Lois Nelson, John Does I - V, Eddie Hunter, Logan County Sheriff's Department and Logan County Commission |
| 2:2011cv00032 |
| January 12, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
| Charleston Office |
| Logan |
| John T. Copenhaver |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
100
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER granting in part and denying in part defendant John Reed's 85 MOTION for Summary Judgment; granting to the extent that it seeks summary judgment on Cout VI and the Fourth and Eighth Amendment claims contained in Co unt I; denying as to Count III and the Fourteenth Amendment claim contained in Count I; granting in part and denying in part Logan County Commission and Logan County Home Confinment Department's 79 MOTION for Summary Judgment; granting to t he extent it seeks summary judgment on Gilco's federal claims in Count II, her state law claims in Cout VI, and the state law negligent hiring, retention, and supervision claims contained in Count V; denying as to Gilco's state law claim of negligent training in Count V. Signed by Judge John T. Copenhaver, Jr. on 8/17/2012. (cc: attys) (tmh)
|
|
Filing
24
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER directing that civil action nos. 2:11-cv-0032, 2:11-cv-0033 and 2:11-cv-0034 are consolidated for purposes of pretrial development and conferencing; the court reserves the question of consolidation of the cases for trial pending a discussion of that matter at the pretrial conference following discovery; the Gilco case (2:11-cv-0032) is designated as the lead action; all further filings shall be captioned and docketed in that case; the court will issue a consolidated scheduling order this same day that will set a single trial date; if it is ultimately determined that the cases should not be consolidated for trial, this court, in consultation with counsel, will select the first action for trial, which will proceed according to the trial date set in the scheduling order; the remaining two actions will then be set for trial as expeditiously as possible thereafter. Signed by Judge John T. Copenhaver, Jr. on 9/2/2011. (cc: attys; any unrepresented parties) (mkw)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
