In re: Oakhurst Development, LLC

Appellant: John W. Jenkins and Rebecca Jenkins
Appellee: Oakhurst Development, LLC
Case Number: 2:2011cv00156
Filed: March 9, 2011
Court: West Virginia Southern District Court
Office: Charleston Office
County: Kanawha
Presiding Judge: Joseph R. Goodwin
Nature of Suit: Appeal
Cause of Action: 28:0158
Jury Demanded By: None

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the West Virginia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: In re: Oakhurst Development, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Appellant: John W. Jenkins
Represented By: Christine B. Stump
Represented By: Barry L. Bruce
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Appellant: Rebecca Jenkins
Represented By: Barry L. Bruce
Represented By: Christine B. Stump
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Appellee: Oakhurst Development, LLC
Represented By: Spencer D. Elliott
Represented By: Amanda M. Ream
Represented By: Mark A. Sadd
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.