Collins v. Johnson & Johnson et al
Fran Denise Collins |
Johnson & Johnson, Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon Women's Health and Urology and Gynecare |
2:2012cv00931 |
March 30, 2012 |
US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
Charleston Office |
XX US, Outside State |
Joseph R. Goodwin |
Personal Injury- Product Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 134 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER (Motions in Limine) The 106 MOTION by Fran Denise Collins in Limine is is GRANTED in part as to Motion in Limine No. 1 and any other conceded motion therein and the remainder of the Motion is DENIED without prejudice; the 102 OMNIBUS MOTION by Ethicon, Inc., Johnson & Johnson in Limine is GRANTED in part as to Motion in Limine No. 2 and any other conceded motion therein and the remainder of the Motion is DENIED without prejudice; the 104 MOTION by Ethicon, Inc ., Johnson & Johnson in Limine to Exclude Evidence of Plaintiff's Allegations of Spoliation is GRANTED; and the 110 MOTION by Ethicon, Inc., Johnson & Johnson for Leave to File a Reply in Support of Defendants' Motion in Limine to Exclude Evidence of Plaintiff's Allegations of Spoliation is DENIED as moot. 102 MOTION in Limine; granting 104 MOTION in Limine; granting in part and denying in part 106 MOTION in Limine; denying 110 MOTION for Leave to File Signed by Judge Robert C. Chambers on 12/13/2017. (cc: counsel of record; any unrepresented party) (mek) |
Filing 120 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER (Daubert Motion re: Shelby Thames, Ph.D.) The court DENIES in part, GRANTS in part, and RESERVES in part the Motion filed in MDL 2327 by Certain Plaintiffs in Wave 1 Cases to Exclude the Opinions and Testimony of Shelby Thames, as more fully set forth herein. Signed by Judge Joseph R. Goodwin on 9/2/2016. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (REF: MDL 2327; Cases Listed on Exhibit) (kll) |
Filing 119 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER (Daubert Motion re: Howard Jordi, Ph.D.) The court DENIES in part, GRANTS in part, and RESERVES in part the Motion filed in MDL 2327 by Ethicon, Inc., Johnson & Johnson to Exclude the Opinions and Testimony of Howard Jordi, Ph.D. in Wave 1 Cases, as more fully set forth herein. Signed by Judge Joseph R. Goodwin on 8/31/2016. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (REF: MDL 2327; Cases Listed on Exhibit)(mmw) |
Filing 117 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER (Daubert Motion re: Barry Schlafstein, M.D.) The court DENIES in part, GRANTS in part, and RESERVES in part the Motion by Certain Plaintiffs in Wave 1 Cases to Exclude Certain Opinions and Testimony of Barry Schlafstein, M.D., as more fully set forth herein. Signed by Judge Joseph R. Goodwin on 8/30/2016. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (REF: MDL 2327; Cases Listed on Exhibit) (mmw) |
Filing 115 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER (Daubert Motion re: Bruce Rosenzweig, M.D.) The court DENIES in part, GRANTS in part, and RESERVES in part the Motion filed in MDL 2327 by Ethicon, Inc., Johnson & Johnson to Exclude Certain General Opinions of Bruce Rosenzweig, M.D. in Wave 1 Cases, as more fully set forth herein. Signed by Judge Joseph R. Goodwin on 8/26/2016. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (REF: MDL 2327; Cases Listed on Exhibit) (kll) |
Filing 113 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER (Daubert Motion re: Peggy Pence, Ph.D.) The court DENIES in part, GRANTS in part, and RESERVES in part the Motion filed in MDL 2327 by Ethicon, Inc., Johnson & Johnson to Exclude Peggy Pence, Ph.D. in Wave 1 Cases, as more fully set forth herein. Signed by Judge Joseph R. Goodwin on 8/25/2016. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (REF: MDL 2327; Cases Listed on Exhibit) (ts) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.