Higgins et al v. Ethicon, Inc.
Susan Higgins and Bob Higgins |
Ethicon, Inc. |
2:2012cv01365 |
May 2, 2012 |
US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
Charleston Office |
XX US, Outside State |
Joseph R. Goodwin |
Personal Injury- Product Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 108 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER (Daubert Motion re: Jaime Sepulveda, M.D.) The 70 DAUBERT MOTION by Bob Higgins, Susan Higgins to Limit or Exclude Testimony of Jaime L. Sepulveda, M.D. is DENIED in part and RESERVED in part, as more fully set forth herein. Signed by Judge Joseph R. Goodwin on 4/5/2017. (cc: counsel of record; any unrepresented party) (mek) |
Filing 104 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER (Plaintiffs' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment) The 64 MOTION by Bob Higgins, Susan Higgins for Partial Summary Judgment is GRANTED with regard to the affirmative defenses listed in 4, 36, 41, 43, 44, 45, 49, 50, 52, 56, 58, and 61. The court further ORDERS that the plaintiffs' Motion is DENIED in all other respects. Signed by Judge Joseph R. Goodwin on 3/30/2017. (cc: counsel of record; any unrepresented party) (kp) |
Filing 91 ORDER granting the Motion by Certain Plaintiffs in Wave 2 Cases to Strike Dr. Shelby F. Thames' Supplemental Reports or, in the Alternative, for Leave to File a Daubert Motion Based on the Flawed Methodology Employed Therein filed in MDL 2327 at ECF No. 2882, as more fully set forth herein. Signed by Judge Joseph R. Goodwin on 3/28/2017. (cc: counsel of record; any unrepresented party) (REF: MDL 2327; Cases Listed on Exhibit A) (ts) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.