Robbins et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
Plaintiff: Mistee Robbins and Shaun Robbins
Defendant: Boston Scientific Corporation
Case Number: 2:2012cv01413
Filed: May 4, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia
Office: Charleston Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: Joseph R. Goodwin
Nature of Suit: Personal Injury- Product Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 7, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 123 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER (Daubert Motions) The 50 Motion to Exclude the Testimony of Michael Thomas Margolis, M.D. is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part; the 49 Motion to Exclude the Opinions and Testimony of Thomas Barker, Ph.D. is GRANTED; the 61 Motion to Exclude the Opinions and Testimony of Jimmy Mays, Ph.D. is GRANTED; the 62 Motion to Exclude the Opinions and Testimony of Peggy Pence, Ph.D. is GRANTED in part, DENIED in part, and RESERVED in part; the 63 Motion to Exclude th e Opinions and Testimony of Russell Dunn, Ph.D. is GRANTED; the 64 Motion to Exclude the Opinions and Testimony of Scott Guelcher, Ph.D. is GRANTED; the 66 Motion to Exclude the Opinions and Testimony of Richard Trepeta, M.D. is GRANTED in part a nd DENIED in part; the 70 Motion to Strike and Exclude the Opinions and Testimony of Vladimir Iakovlev, M.D. is GRANTED; the 47 Motion to Exclude the Opinions and Testimony of Niall Galloway, M.D. is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part; the 60 M otion to Limit the Opinions and Testimony of Bobby L. Shull, M.D. is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part; the 54 Motion to Limit the Opinions and Testimony of Dionysios Veronikis, M.D. is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part; the 65 Motion to Exclud e the Opinions and Testimony of William Porter, M.D. is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part; the 52 Motion to Exclude the Opinions and Testimony of Gary L. Winn, Ph.D. is RESERVED; the 56 Motion to Exclude or Limit the Testimony of Christine Braue r, Ph.D. is GRANTED; the 68 Motion to Exclude the Testimony and Opinions of Dr. Stephen Spiegelberg, Ph.D. is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part; the 69 Motion to Exclude the Opinions and Testimony of Stephen F. Badylak, D.V.M., Ph.D., M.D. is DE NIED; the 53 Motion to Exclude the Opinions and Testimony of Roger Goldberg, M.D. is GRANTED in part, DENIED in part, and RESERVED in part; the 57 Motion to Exclude Certain Opinions and Testimony of Patrick Culligan, M.D. is GRANTED in part, DENI ED in part, and RESERVED in part; and the 55 Motion to Exclude Opinions and Testimony of James Rice, M.D. is GRANTED in part, DENIED in part, and RESERVED in part. Signed by Judge Joseph R. Goodwin on 6/7/2016. (cc: counsel of record; any unrepresented party) (kp)
May 19, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 122 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER (Motions in Limine) The court GRANTS the plaintiffs' 118 Motion in Limine Regarding Evidence Relating to the United States Food and Drug Administration, and GRANTS in part and RESERVES in part the defendant's 119 Initial Motions in Limine. Signed by Judge Joseph R. Goodwin on 5/19/2016. (cc: counsel of record; any unrepresented party) (kp)
October 6, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 115 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER (Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment) Boston Scientific Corporation's 59 MOTION for Summary Judgment Against Plaintiffs Mistee Robbins and Shawn Robbins is GRANTED IN PART with respect to Ms. Robbin s's claims for manufacturing defect, under theories of strict liability and negligence; breach of implied warranty; and breach of express warranty and DENIED IN PART with respect to Ms. Robbins's claims for strict liability for failure to warn, strict liability for design defect, and negligence; and Mr. Robbins's claim for loss of consortium. Signed by Judge Joseph R. Goodwin on 10/6/2015. (cc: counsel of record; any unrepresented party) (ts)
October 5, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 114 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER (Defendant's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment) denying 58 MOTION WITH MEMO IN SUPPORT by Boston Scientific Corporation for Partial Summary Judgment on Plaintiffs Mistee Robbins and Shawn Robbins Punitive Damages Claim, as more fully set forth herein. Signed by Judge Joseph R. Goodwin on 10/5/2015. (cc: counsel of record; any unrepresented party) (kp)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the West Virginia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Robbins et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mistee Robbins
Represented By: Robert E. Price
Represented By: John E. Sutherland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Shaun Robbins
Represented By: Robert E. Price
Represented By: John E. Sutherland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Boston Scientific Corporation
Represented By: Robert T. Adams
Represented By: Matthew D. Keenan
Represented By: Bryan Pratt
Represented By: Jon A. Strongman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?