City of New Martinsville, West Virginia v. Public Service Commission of West Virginia

Justia Dockets & Filings Fourth Circuit West Virginia Southern District City of New Martinsville, West Virginia v. Public Service Commission of West Virginia

City of New Martinsville, West Virginia v. Public Service Commission of West Virginia

Plaintiff:	City of New Martinsville, West Virginia
Defendant:	Public Service Commission of West Virginia
Case Number:	2:2012cv01809
Filed:	June 1, 2012
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia
Office:	Charleston Office
County:	Wetzel
Presiding Judge:	John T. Copenhaver
Nature of Suit:	Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2201
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
May 21, 2013	Filing 42 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting plaintiff City of New Martinsville's 33 MOTION to amend its complaint; the Clerk is directed to file New Martinsville's proposed amended complaint; New Martinsville is to direct service on the inco ming commissioners forthwith by 6/4/2013; the court treats the existing motions to dismiss and for judgment on the pleadings, filed 1/25/2013, as effective against the amended complaint; any existing defendant wishing to supplement or renew its motion is directed to do so by 6/4/2013; the individual commissioners may file motions to dismiss by 6/28/2013. Signed by Judge John T. Copenhaver, Jr. on 5/21/2013. (cc: attys) (taq)
December 21, 2012	Filing 22 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting party-defendants by Monongahela Power Company and Potomac Edison Companys 12 MOTION to Intervene. Signed by Judge John T. Copenhaver, Jr. on 12/21/2012. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (tmr)

Date Filed

Document Text

May 21, 2013

Filing 42 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting plaintiff City of New Martinsville's 33 MOTION to amend its complaint; the Clerk is directed to file New Martinsville's proposed amended complaint; New Martinsville is to direct service on the inco ming commissioners forthwith by 6/4/2013; the court treats the existing motions to dismiss and for judgment on the pleadings, filed 1/25/2013, as effective against the amended complaint; any existing defendant wishing to supplement or renew its motion is directed to do so by 6/4/2013; the individual commissioners may file motions to dismiss by 6/28/2013. Signed by Judge John T. Copenhaver, Jr. on 5/21/2013. (cc: attys) (taq)

December 21, 2012

Filing 22 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting party-defendants by Monongahela Power Company and Potomac Edison Companys 12 MOTION to Intervene. Signed by Judge John T. Copenhaver, Jr. on 12/21/2012. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (tmr)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the West Virginia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: City of New Martinsville, West Virginia v. Public Service Commission of West Virginia
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Public Service Commission of West Virginia
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: City of New Martinsville, West Virginia
Represented By:	Zachary D. Kravitz
Represented By:	Sarah D. Morrison
Represented By:	Gary J. Newell
Represented By:	Robert R. Rodecker
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?