Thompson v. Kanawha County Commission et al
| Janet L. Thompson |
| Kent Carper, Hoppy Shores, Dave Hardy, Kanawha County' Clerks Office, Vera McCormick, City of Charleston West Virginia City Council Members, James M. Reishman, Natalie Tenant, Tim Leach, Charleston Gazette Newspaper, Charleston Daily Mail Newspaper, Rod Blackstone, Deitzler, Kanawha County Commission, Flaherty, Paul Ellis and City of Charleston West Virginia |
| 2:2012cv01945 |
| June 22, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
| Charleston Office |
| Kanawha |
| Thomas E. Johnston |
| Mary E. Stanley |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
95
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER pursuant to plaintiff's 91 MOTION for new trial and requesting the Court reconsider its 3/25/2013 89 Memorandum Opinion and Order and 90 Judgment Order, upon consideration of said motion, the Court does not find any error contained in its 3/25/2013 Memorandum Opinion and Judgment Order, nor does it find that failing to grant the Rule 59(e) motion would result in manifest injustice to the plaintiff; plaintiff presents no extraordinary need or circumstance to justify such an extraordinary remedy. Signed by Judge Thomas E. Johnston on 5/23/2013. (cc: plaintiff, pro se; attys; any unrepresented party) (taq)
|
|
Filing
89
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER overruling plaintiff's 87 , 88 Objections; adopting the 83 , 84 Proposed Findings and Recommendation; granting the Charleston Defendants' 43 Motion to Dismiss and Defendants Natalie Tenant's and Tim Leach's 26 Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's 22 Amended Complaint; and directing this case removed from the Court's Docket. Signed by Judge Thomas E. Johnston on 3/25/2013. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (taq)
|
|
Filing
54
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying plaintiff's 52 MOTION to Void Final Order of Election Contest; pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a), the parties shall have 14 days from the date of filing this Memorandum Opinion and Order within which to file written objections; extension of time period may be granted by the presiding District Judge for good cause shown. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mary E. Stanley on 8/30/2012. (cc: Plaintiff; attys) (tmh)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
