Currie v. Johnson & Johnson et al
Plaintiff: Anne M. Currie
Defendant: Johnson & Johnson, Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon Women's Health and Urology and Gynecare
Case Number: 2:2012cv02955
Filed: July 11, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia
Office: Charleston Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: Joseph R. Goodwin
Nature of Suit: Personal Injury- Product Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 5, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 69 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER (Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment) granting in part and denying in part 51 MOTION for Summary Judgment. Ethicon's Motion is GRANTED with regard to the following claims: manufacturing defect, unjust enrichment, and violation of consumer protection laws; Ethicon's Motion is DENIED in all other respects. Signed by Judge Joseph R. Goodwin on 7/5/2017. (cc: counsel of record; any unrepresented party) (mks)
May 18, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 66 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER (Daubert Motion re: Dionysios Veronikis, M.D.) The 53 MOTION by Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC, Johnson & Johnson to Limit the Case-Specific Testimony of Dionysios Veronikis, M.D. is DENIED in part and RESERVED in part, as more fully set forth herein. Signed by Judge Joseph R. Goodwin on 5/18/2017. (cc: counsel of record; any unrepresented party) (kp)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the West Virginia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Currie v. Johnson & Johnson et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Anne M. Currie
Represented By: Justin R. Kaufman
Represented By: Bill Robins, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Johnson & Johnson
Represented By: Philip J. Combs
Represented By: Laura H. Dixon
Represented By: William M. Gage
Represented By: Christy D. Jones
Represented By: Susan M. Robinson
Represented By: Kari L. Sutherland
Represented By: David B. Thomas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ethicon, Inc.
Represented By: Philip J. Combs
Represented By: Laura H. Dixon
Represented By: William M. Gage
Represented By: Christy D. Jones
Represented By: Susan M. Robinson
Represented By: Kari L. Sutherland
Represented By: David B. Thomas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ethicon Women's Health and Urology
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Gynecare
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?