Wiggan v. United States of America

Petitioner: Janeek Wiggan
Respondent: United States of America
Case Number: 2:2012cv04554
Filed: August 21, 2012
Court: West Virginia Southern District Court
Office: Charleston Office
County: Kanawha
Referring Judge: Mary E. Stanley
Presiding Judge: John T. Copenhaver
Nature of Suit: Motions to Vacate Sentence
Cause of Action: 28:2255
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
July 27, 2015 226 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER adopting 225 Proposed Findings and Recommendations; denying 215 MOTION to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence (2255) by Janeek Wiggan. Signed by Judge John T. Copenhaver, Jr. on 7/27/2015. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party, Magistrate Judge) (tmr)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the West Virginia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Wiggan v. United States of America
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Janeek Wiggan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: United States of America
Represented By: John J. Frail
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?