Stidham et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
| Anne Stidham and Mike Stidham |
| Boston Scientific Corporation |
| 2:2012cv06759 |
| October 18, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
| Charleston Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Joseph R. Goodwin |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
107
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER (Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment) Boston Scientific Corporation's 48 MOTION for Summary Judgment is GRANTED IN PART with respect to the plaintiffs' claims of strict liability for manufacturing defect, negligent manufacturing, breach of implied warranty of fitness for a particular purpose, and fraudulent concealment, and DENIED IN PART with respect to the plaintiffs' claims of strict liability for design defect, strict liability for failure to warn, negligent design, negligent failure to warn, breach of express warranty, breach of implied warranty of merchantability, and loss of consortium, as more fully set forth herein. Signed by Judge Joseph R. Goodwin on 5/22/2015. (cc: counsel of record; any unrepresented party) (ts)
|
|
Filing
101
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER (Defendant's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment) Boston Scientific Corporation's 49 MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment on Plaintiffs Anne and Mike Stidham's Punitive Damages Claim is DENIED. Signed by Judge Joseph R. Goodwin on 4/7/2015. (cc: counsel of record; any unrepresented party) (ts)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
