Anderson et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Linda K. Anderson and Jack Marion Anderson
Defendant: Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Case Number: 2:2012cv07189
Filed: October 31, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia
Office: Charleston Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: Joseph R Goodwin
Nature of Suit: Personal Inj. Prod. Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 18, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 18, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 26 ORDER granting #25 JOINT MOTION by Jack Marion Anderson, Linda K. Anderson, Ethicon, Inc., Johnson & Johnson to Dismiss With Prejudice. No other defendants remain. Each party shall bear their or its own costs. Signed by Judge Joseph R. Goodwin on 4/18/2019. (cc: Clerk of the JPMDL; attys; any unrepresented party) (mms)
April 16, 2019 Filing 25 JOINT MOTION by Jack Marion Anderson, Linda K. Anderson, Ethicon, Inc., Johnson & Johnson to Dismiss With Prejudice. (Gage, William) (Modified on 4/16/2019 to add party filer) (mkw).
February 4, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 24 PRETRIAL ORDER # 328 (Docket Control Order - Ethicon, Inc. Wave 11 Cases) The cases on Exhibit A are: 1. removed from the pending inactive docket; and 2. placed on the active docket. As to the cases on Exhibits A and B: 1. The cases are no longer eligible for return to the inactive docket nor may notices of settlement be filed to relieve the parties from scheduling deadlines; 2. To the extent other defendants, in addition to Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson, are named in the cases on Exhibits A and B, the deadlines below also apply to them; 3. The Clerk will file this Docket Control Order in the main MDL and, as of the time of that filing in the main MDL, every case listed on Exhibits A and B (hereinafter referred to as "Wave 11 cases") becomes subject to the deadlines in this Docket Control Order.; and 4. The following deadlines immediately apply in all Ethicon Wave 11 cases with one important exception. If any of the cases on any exhibit were previously on a docket control order and dispositive and Daubert deadlines had passed before such cases became inactive, the parties may not file or refile dispositive or Daubert motions without first seeking leave of court for good cause shown. A. SCHEDULING DEADLINES.. The following deadlines shall apply in all Ethicon Wave 11 cases: Plaintiff Fact Sheets due 02/15/2019; Defendant Fact Sheets due 02/22/2019; Deadline for written discovery requests due 03/25/2019; Expert disclosures served by plaintiffs due 05/24/2019; Expert disclosure served by defendants due 06/24/2019; Expert disclosure served for rebuttal due 07/01/2019; Deposition deadline and close of discovery due 08/01/2019; Filing of dispositive motions due 08/14/2019; Response to dispositive motions due 08/28/2019; Reply to response to dispositive motions due 09/04/2019; Filing of Daubert motions due 08/14/2019; Responses to Daubert motions due 08/29/2019; Reply to response to Daubert motions due 09/05/2019. B. MOTION PRACTICE. 3. Confidential Documents. Any consolidated motion to seal is due on or before 6/27/2019, and any response is due by 7/11/2019. Any reply is due by 7/18/2019. The court expects full compliance with Local Rule of Civil Procedure 26.4(c). C. CASES READY FOR TRANSFER, REMAND OR TRIAL 1. Venue Recommendations. By no later than 7/8/2019, the parties shall meet and confer concerning the appropriate venue for each of the cases, and the parties are ORDERED to submit joint venue recommendations to the court by 7/15/2019. Signed by Judge Joseph R. Goodwin on 2/4/2019. (cc: Clerk of the JPMDL; attys; any unrepresented party) (REF: MDL 2327; Ethicon Wave 11 cases identified on Exhibits A and B) (mek) (ADI)
August 15, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 23 ORDER The deadline to submit joint motions of dismissal is extended to 10/31/2018 for all cases in MDL 2327 currently on an inactive docket. All remaining provisions of Inactive Docket Orders entered in MDL 2327 and individual cases remain in effect. Signed by Judge Joseph R. Goodwin on 8/15/2018. (cc: counsel of record; any unrepresented party) (REF: MDL 2327; Cases on inactive docket) (mek) (ADI)
May 7, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 22 ORDER (CHANGE TO CHARACTERIZATION BY CLERK'S OFFICE OF CASES ON INACTIVE DOCKET) It is directed that in all cases with an inactive docket order which resulted in "Closed" and "MDL Ethicon Inactive" flags on the docket sheet, the Clerk is directed to update the docket by removing the "Closed" flag from the docket sheet and leaving the "MDL Ethicon Inactive" flag, for reasons set forth herein. Signed by Judge Joseph R. Goodwin on 4/26/2018. (cc: counsel of record; any unrepresented party) (REF: MDL 2327; Member Cases Flagged "Closed" and "MDL Ethicon Inactive") (brn) (ADI)
March 27, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 21 ORDER The deadline to submit joint motions of dismissal is extended to 8/31/2018 for all cases in MDL 2327 currently on an inactive docket. All remaining provisions of Inactive Docket Orders entered in MDL 2327 and individual cases remain in effect. Signed by Judge Joseph R. Goodwin on 3/16/2018. (cc: counsel of record; any unrepresented party) (REF: MDL 2327; Cases on inactive docket) (ts) (ADI)
October 27, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 20 INACTIVE DOCKET ORDER: The court has been advised that the plaintiff(s) and Ethicon, Inc. have reached a settlement with regard to Ethicon. All discovery deadlines are continued until further order of the court. The Clerk is directed to retire this case from the active docket. Plaintiff(s) and Ethicon may submit an agreed order of dismissal with prejudice on or before 3/31/2018; if settlements are not finalized and dismissal orders are not submitted by then the Court will have a hearing to determine the appropriate action pertaining to any remaining cases on the inactive docket. Counsel for plaintiffs and defendant(s) are directed to provide quarterly reports as to their progress in dismissing cases on the inactive docket. The court will reinstate the case to the active docket if one of the parties shows good cause for such reinstatement. This Order is related to the Proposed Inactive Docket Order filed at ECF No. 4788 in MDL Case No. 2327 Ethicon. Signed by Judge Joseph R. Goodwin on 10/27/2017. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (rec)
September 26, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 19 ORDER The Motion by Ethicon, Inc., Johnson & Johnson to Compel Discovery or, in the Alternative, to Exclude Certain Opinion Testimony filed in MDL 2327 is GRANTED, in part, and DENIED, in part; Plaintiffs are hereby ORDERED to collect and produce to the defendants certain information set forth herein pertaining to the article entitled "Oxidation and Degradation of Polypropylene Transvaginal Mesh," relied upon by Dr. Guelcher; With respect to Defendants' motion that they be permitted to take a supplemental deposition of Dr. Guelcher to question him about the raw data, the motion is DENIED. Furthermore, Defendants' motion to preclude Dr. Guelcher from offering opinions or testimony based upon the above-mentioned article is likewise DENIED, as it is moot. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cheryl A. Eifert on 9/26/2017. (cc: attys) (REF: MDL 2327; Wave 5 Cases) (mks)
September 13, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 18 PRETRIAL ORDER #270 (ORDER RE: STIPULATIONS EXTENDING DISCOVERY) After a cursory review of many individual cases in the Ethicon MDL, the court notes that the parties have attempted to stipulate a change in the court's Docket Control Orders setting deadlines for discovery. The parties cannot extend court ordered discovery deadlines past the date set for completion of discovery without approval from the court. Fed. R. Civ. P. Rule 29(b); see Fed. R. Civ. P. Rule 16(b)(4). Here, the parties are repeatedly attempting to stipulate to delay the completion of discovery, which affects other deadlines in the Docket Control Orders, such as the deadline for filing dispositive motions and the deadline for filing Daubert motions. Under Local Rule 16.1(f)(3), the court is not required to, nor does it, recognize stipulations purporting to extend the discovery deadlines past the close of discovery. See LR Civ. P. 16.1(f)(3). Therefore, all such stipulations filed in the Ethicon MDL which are inconsistent with Local Rule 16.1(f)(3) are INEFFECTUAL and VOID. Such stipulations undermine the policy goals of the MDL, including convenience of the parties, efficiency of the pretrial proceedings, and consistency on related issues. The parties are DIRECTED to cease filing such stipulations purporting to extend the discovery deadlines contrary to Local Rule 16.1(f)(3). When the parties seek an extension of discovery deadlines past the date set for the completion of discovery in the Docket Control Order, they must do so by motion in the individual case. The Docket Control Orders are plain that the only discovery permitted after the close of discovery are depositions of the plaintiffs friends and family members, and only if such depositions are requested before the discovery deadline. Those orders remain unaffected. Modifications of the discovery schedule may be considered, for good cause shown. Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b)(4); see, e.g., PTO #251 at A.2.f. Good cause does not include mere agreement of the parties. Signed by Judge Joseph R. Goodwin on 9/13/2017. (cc: Clerk of the JPMDL Panel; attys) (REF: MDL 2327; Ethicon Wave 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 Cases) (kab)
August 9, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 17 PRETRIAL ORDER # 268 (Motion for a Protective Order and Motion for De Bene Esse Deposition) The Motion by Ethicon, Inc. Johnson & Johnson for Protective Order Precluding De Bene Esse Deposition of Plaintiffs' Expert Witness Scott A. Guelcher, PH.D. and Motion for De Bene Esse Deposition of Scott A. Guelcher, PH.D. filed in MDL 2327 are DENIED as to the motion for a protective order and GRANTED as to the motion for leave to conduct a de bene esse deposition of Dr. Guelcher. Signed by Judge Cheryl A. Eifert on 8/9/2017. (cc: Clerk of the JPMDL; attys) (REF: MDL 2327; Wave 5 Cases) (st)
August 4, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 16 PRETRIAL ORDER # 267 (Re: Order Dismissing Ethicon, LLC in Cases Listed on Exhibit A) Pursuant to PTO # 117 filed in MDL 2327, the Court granted Plaintiffs' Motion to Amend First Amended Master Long Form Complaint and Jury Demand and Amended Master Short Form Complaint to the extent it sought to remove defendant Ethicon, LLC from the Master Long Form Complaint and Amended Short Form Complaint and provided that the Court would initiate a show cause process regarding Ethicon, LLC in cases filed prior to the date of the Order; the cases identified as part of Wave discovery and included in the attached Exhibit A all pre-date PTO # 117 and name Ethicon, LLC as a defendant; the parties have agreed to dismiss Ethicon, LLC without prejudice from the cases identified on Exhibit A; it is ORDERED that Ethicon, LLC shall be dismissed without prejudice from each case identified on Exhibit A. Signed by Judge Joseph R. Goodwin on 8/4/2017. (cc: Clerk of JPMDL; attys; any unrepresented party) (REF: MDL 2327; Cases Listed on Exhibit A) (rec)
June 21, 2017 Filing 15 PLAINTIFF FACT SHEET filed by Linda K. Anderson. (Lerer, Jessica)
March 6, 2017 Filing 14 NOTICE OF ATTORNEY APPEARANCE AND COUNSEL CONTACT INFORMATION FORM by Daniel R. Higginbotham on behalf of Ethicon, Inc., Johnson & Johnson. (Higginbotham, Daniel)
February 28, 2017 Filing 13 NOTICE OF ATTORNEY APPEARANCE AND COUNSEL CONTACT INFORMATION FORM by Sarah A. Martin on behalf of Ethicon, Inc., Johnson & Johnson. (Martin, Sarah)
February 24, 2017 Filing 12 NOTICE OF ATTORNEY APPEARANCE AND COUNSEL CONTACT INFORMATION FORM by Sherrie A. Armstrong on behalf of Ethicon, Inc., Johnson & Johnson. (Armstrong, Sherrie)
February 24, 2017 Filing 11 NOTICE OF ATTORNEY APPEARANCE AND COUNSEL CONTACT INFORMATION FORM by Aaron N. Arthur on behalf of Ethicon, Inc., Johnson & Johnson. (Arthur, Aaron)
February 21, 2017 Filing 10 NOTICE OF VIDEO DEPOSITION by Ethicon, Inc., Johnson & Johnson of Aaron M. Toler on 3/7/17 at 9:00 am (Robinson, Susan)
February 21, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 9 PRETRIAL ORDER # 248 (Docket Control Order - Wave 5 Cases) The cases attached hereto as Exhibit A will be known as "Ethicon Wave 5 cases" and the following deadlines apply: Scheduling Deadlines. Plaintiff Fact Sheets due by 3/22/2017, Defendant Fact Sheets due by 4/22/2017, Deadline for written discovery requests is 6/05/2017, Expert disclosure by plaintiffs due by 5/22/2017, Expert disclosure by defendants due by 6/19/2017, Expert disclosure for rebuttal purposes due by 7/05/2017, Deposition deadline and close of discovery is 7/19/2017, Filing of Dispositive Motions due by 8/08/2017, Response to Dispositive Motions due by 8/22/2017, Reply to response to dispositive motions due by 8/29/2017, Filing of Daubert motions due by 8/15/2017, Responses to Daubert motions due by 8/29/2017, and Reply to response to Daubert motions due by 9/05/2017. Confidential Documents. In the event there are issues related to sealing of confidential documents that the parties are unable to resolve, they must be brought to the courts attention in a consolidated manner as follows: A consolidated motion to seal is due on or before 6/28/2017, any response is due 7/12/2017 and any reply is due 7/19/2017. Venue Recommendations. By no later than 6/30/2017, the parties shall meet and confer concerning the appropriate venue for each of the cases, and the parties shall submit joint venue recommendations to the court by 7/10/2017. Signed by Judge Joseph R. Goodwin on 2/21/2017. (cc: Clerk of the JPMDL; attys) (REF: MDL 2327; Wave 5 Cases Listed on Exhibit A) (rec)
December 17, 2015 Filing 8 NOTICE OF ATTORNEY APPEARANCE AND COUNSEL CONTACT INFORMATION FORM by William M. Gage on behalf of Ethicon, Inc., Johnson & Johnson. (Gage, William)
December 2, 2015 Filing 7 NOTICE OF ATTORNEY APPEARANCE AND COUNSEL CONTACT INFORMATION FORM by Kari L. Sutherland on behalf of Ethicon, Inc., Johnson & Johnson. (Sutherland, Kari)
December 16, 2014 Filing 6 NOTICE OF ATTORNEY APPEARANCE AND COUNSEL CONTACT INFORMATION FORM by Christy D. Jones on behalf of Ethicon, Inc., Johnson & Johnson. (Jones, Christy)
November 7, 2012 Filing 5 NOTICE OF ATTORNEY APPEARANCE AND COUNSEL CONTACT INFORMATION FORM by Philip J. Combs on behalf of Ethicon, Inc., Johnson & Johnson. (Combs, Philip)
November 7, 2012 Filing 4 NOTICE OF ATTORNEY APPEARANCE AND COUNSEL CONTACT INFORMATION FORM by Susan M. Robinson on behalf of Ethicon, Inc., Johnson & Johnson. (Robinson, Susan)
November 7, 2012 Filing 3 NOTICE OF ATTORNEY APPEARANCE AND COUNSEL CONTACT INFORMATION FORM by David B. Thomas on behalf of Ethicon, Inc., Johnson & Johnson. (Thomas, David)
November 2, 2012 Filing 2 TRANSMITTED PRETRIAL ORDER 21 (Order Cancelling November 2, 2012, Status Conference) entered on 10/29/2012 in MDL 2327 to attorneys in member case. (jap)
October 31, 2012 Filing 1 SHORT FORM COMPLAINT. Filing Fee $350.00. Receipt # 0425-2062073. (Attachment: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (gjb)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the West Virginia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Anderson et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Linda K. Anderson
Represented By: Jessica Hanna Lerer
Represented By: Joseph Preston Strom, Jr.
Represented By: Mario A. Pacella
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jack Marion Anderson
Represented By: Joseph Preston Strom, Jr.
Represented By: Jessica Hanna Lerer
Represented By: Mario A. Pacella
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ethicon, Inc.
Represented By: Daniel R. Higginbotham
Represented By: David B. Thomas
Represented By: Aaron N. Arthur
Represented By: Christy D. Jones
Represented By: Philip J. Combs
Represented By: Sarah A. Martin
Represented By: Sherrie A. Armstrong
Represented By: Kari L. Sutherland
Represented By: Susan M. Robinson
Represented By: William M. Gage
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ethicon, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Johnson & Johnson
Represented By: Aaron N. Arthur
Represented By: Christy D. Jones
Represented By: Daniel R. Higginbotham
Represented By: David B. Thomas
Represented By: Philip J. Combs
Represented By: Sarah A. Martin
Represented By: Sherrie A. Armstrong
Represented By: Susan M. Robinson
Represented By: Kari L. Sutherland
Represented By: William M. Gage
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?