McCormack et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
Lourdes McCormack and John McCormack |
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson |
2:2013cv02069 |
February 6, 2013 |
US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
Charleston Office |
XX US, Outside State |
Joseph R. Goodwin |
Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 36 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER The 31 RENEWED MOTION by Ethicon, Inc., Johnson & Johnson to Dismiss With Prejudice is GRANTED and Ethicon is DISMISSED with prejudice. Signed by Judge Joseph R. Goodwin on 11/6/2017. (cc: counsel of record; any unrepresented party) (mek) |
Filing 29 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER denying 18 MOTION by Ethicon, Inc., Johnson & Johnson to Dismiss; the plaintiffs have until 10/6/2017 to serve a completed PFS with verifications and authorizations on Ethicon; and failure to comply with this Order may result in dismissal with prejudice upon motion by Ethicon, as more fully set forth herein Signed by Judge Joseph R. Goodwin on 9/7/2017. (cc: counsel of record; any unrepresented party) (brn) |
Filing 27 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER denying 18 MOTION by Ethicon, Inc., Johnson & Johnson to Dismiss; the plaintiffs have until 10/6/2017 to serve a completed PFS with verifications and authorizations on Ethicon; and failure to comply with this Order may result in dismissal with prejudice upon motion by Ethicon, as more fully set forth herein. Signed by Judge Joseph R. Goodwin on 9/6/2017. (cc: counsel of record; any unrepresented party) (brn) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.