EQT Corporation v. Toney
EQT Corporation |
Gregory Toney |
2:2013cv02552 |
February 13, 2013 |
US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
Charleston Office |
Kanawha |
Joseph R. Goodwin |
Contract: Other |
09 U.S.C. ยง 1 U.S. Arbitration Act |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 23 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying EQT Corporation's 1 Petition for Order Compelling Arbitration Pursuant to 9 U.S.C. § 4; and granting Respondent's 13 MOTION to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Joseph R. Goodwin on 4/26/2013. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (taq) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: EQT Corporation v. Toney | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: EQT Corporation | |
Represented By: | Kevin L. Carr |
Represented By: | Ellen J. Vance |
Represented By: | Kim M. Watterson |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: Gregory Toney | |
Represented By: | Sean W. Cook |
Represented By: | Mark L. French |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.