EQT Corporation v. Toney

Petitioner: EQT Corporation
Respondent: Gregory Toney
Case Number: 2:2013cv02552
Filed: February 13, 2013
Court: West Virginia Southern District Court
Office: Charleston Office
County: Kanawha
Presiding Judge: Joseph R. Goodwin
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 09:1 U.S. Arbitration Act
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
April 26, 2013 23 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying EQT Corporation's 1 Petition for Order Compelling Arbitration Pursuant to 9 U.S.C. § 4; and granting Respondent's 13 MOTION to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Joseph R. Goodwin on 4/26/2013. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (taq)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the West Virginia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: EQT Corporation v. Toney
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: EQT Corporation
Represented By: Kevin L. Carr(Designation Retained)
Represented By: Ellen J. Vance(Designation Retained)
Represented By: Kim M. Watterson(Designation Retained)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Gregory Toney
Represented By: Sean W. Cook
Represented By: Mark L. French
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?