Carter v. West Virginia Regional Jail and Correctional Facility Authority et al
| Timothy S. Carter |
| West Virginia Regional Jail and Correctional Facility Authority, Larry Parsons, Stephen Tucker, Michael Clark and Unnamed Employees of the West Virginia Regional Jail and Correctional Facility Authority |
| 2:2013cv08900 |
| April 24, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
| Charleston Office |
| Kanawha |
| Joseph R. Goodwin |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
28
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part Plaintiff's 26 MOTION for Relief from the 24 Order of this Court Granting Dismissal as more fully set forth herein; the court will file an amended judgment order indicating that the dismissal in this case was without prejudice Signed by Judge Joseph R. Goodwin on 6/4/2014. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (tmh)
|
|
Filing
24
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying as moot, Defendant West Virginia Regional Jail and Correctional Facility Authority's 3 MOTION to Dismiss; granting Defendants' 16 MOTION to Dismiss the 13 Amended Complaint; directing that judgment be entered in favor of the defendants and that this case be dismissed and stricken from the docket of this court. Signed by Judge Joseph R. Goodwin on 11/12/2013. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (tmh)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
