Jenkins et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
| Diane Jenkins and Troy Jenkins |
| Boston Scientific Corporation |
| 2:2013cv09968 |
| May 2, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
| Charleston Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Joseph R. Goodwin |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
106
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER (Motions in Limine) The court GRANTS the plaintiffs' 102 Motion in Limine, and GRANTS in part and RESERVES in part the defendant's 103 Initial Motions in Limine. Signed by Judge Joseph R. Goodwin on 5/19/2016. (cc: counsel of record; any unrepresented party) (ts)
|
|
Filing
101
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER (Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment) The 42 MOTION by Boston Scientific Corporation for Summary Judgment is GRANTED IN PART with respect to the plaintiffs' claims of strict liability for manufacturin g defect, strict liability for failure to warn, negligent manufacturing, negligent failure to warn, breach of express warranty, breach of implied warranty of merchantability, and breach of implied warranty of fitness for a particular purpose, and DENIED IN PART with respect to the plaintiffs' claims of strict liability for design defect, negligent design, and loss of consortium, as more fully set forth herein. Signed by Judge Joseph R. Goodwin on 4/12/2016. (cc: counsel of record; any unrepresented party) (ts)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
