Young v. United States of America
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|September 29, 2016
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: adopting 280 Proposed Findings and Recommendations as to Tommy Edward Young Sr.; denying 250 MOTION to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence (2255) by Tommy Edward Young Sr.; dismisses with prejudice this case and di recting the Clerk to remove this action from the Court's docket; granting a certificate of appealability allowing petitioner to appeal this decision in its entirety. Signed by Judge Thomas E. Johnston on 9/29/2016. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (tmr)
|June 7, 2013
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part government's 256 MOTION For an Order Directing Movant to File a Privilege Waiver and an Order Directing Movant's Former Counsel to Provide Information to the United States Concerning Movant's Claim of Ineffective Assistance of Counsel and an Abeyance as to Tommy Edward Young Sr.; denying government's request for a written privilege waiver; directing trial counsel to file within 30 days from the date of this o rder an affidavit responding only to defendant's specific claim of ineffective assistance of counsel; directing that the attorney-client privilege, which attaches to the communications between Movant and Victor, shall not be deemed automatically waived in any other Federal or State proceeding byvirtue of the above-ordered disclosure in this § 2255 proceeding; granting the motion for abeyance. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cheryl A. Eifert on 6/7/2013. (cc: attys; movant) (tmr)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the West Virginia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?