Harris v. Ballard et al
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|February 12, 2015
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER adopting the 61 Proposed Findings and Recommendation; granting the defendants' 55 Motion for summary judgment and 53 Motion to dismiss for plaintiff's failure to participate in discovery; and that this action is dismissed and stricken from the docket. Signed by Judge John T. Copenhaver, Jr. on 2/12/2015. (cc: plaintiff, pro se; counsel of record; United States Magistrate Judge) (taq)
|July 18, 2014
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting defendants Warden David Ballard and Lieutenant Charles Legg's 35 MOTION to Dismiss amended complaint; denying plaintiff's 39 MOTION to Dismiss the Responses of the defendants David Ballard and Char les Legg; directing that this action be, and hereby is, referred anew to the magistrate judge under the terms set forth in the standing order entered 5/9/2013. Signed by Judge John T. Copenhaver, Jr. on 7/18/2014. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party, Magistrate Judge) (tmr)
|December 10, 2013
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER directing that the 29 Proposed Findings and Recommendation is adopted by the court; the claims for declaratory and injunctive relief are dismissed as moot; this action is referred to the magistrate judge under the terms of the original referral order. Signed by Judge John T. Copenhaver, Jr. on 12/10/2013. (cc: pro se plaintiff; attys; United States Magistrate Judge) (tmh)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the West Virginia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?