O'Dell v. Zurich American Insurance Company

Justia Dockets & Filings Fourth Circuit West Virginia Southern District O'Dell v. Zurich American Insurance Company

O'Dell v. Zurich American Insurance Company

Plaintiff:	Gregory J. O'Dell
Defendant:	Zurich American Insurance Company
Case Number:	2:2013cv12894
Filed:	May 31, 2013
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia
Office:	Charleston Office
County:	Boone
Presiding Judge:	John T. Copenhaver
Nature of Suit:	Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974
Cause of Action:	29 U.S.C. § 1132
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
September 29, 2015	Filing 28 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER denying the parties' 19 MOTION for Summary Judgment, 20 MOTION for Summary Judgment and 27 MOTION for Summary Judgment; Gregory O'Dell's claim is deemed timely filed and this matter is remanded to Zurich American Insurance Company for further review consistent herewith; directing that Zurich conduct a thorough inquiry into whether, and for what period of time, O'Dell was permanently and totally disabled and make the full and fair rev iew directed under "Remedy," all with the aid of such further evidence as O'Dell may promptly present on remand or as may later be requested or allowed by Zurich; and as directed and set forth more fully herein. Signed by Judge John T. Copenhaver, Jr. on 9/29/2015. (cc: counsel of record; any unrepresented parties) (taq)
October 4, 2013	Filing 18 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying defendant, Zurich American Insurance Company's 15 MOTION to conduct discovery. Signed by Judge John T. Copenhaver, Jr. on 10/4/2013. (cc: attys) (taq)

Date Filed

Document Text

September 29, 2015

Filing 28 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER denying the parties' 19 MOTION for Summary Judgment, 20 MOTION for Summary Judgment and 27 MOTION for Summary Judgment; Gregory O'Dell's claim is deemed timely filed and this matter is remanded to Zurich American Insurance Company for further review consistent herewith; directing that Zurich conduct a thorough inquiry into whether, and for what period of time, O'Dell was permanently and totally disabled and make the full and fair rev iew directed under "Remedy," all with the aid of such further evidence as O'Dell may promptly present on remand or as may later be requested or allowed by Zurich; and as directed and set forth more fully herein. Signed by Judge John T. Copenhaver, Jr. on 9/29/2015. (cc: counsel of record; any unrepresented parties) (taq)

October 4, 2013

Filing 18 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying defendant, Zurich American Insurance Company's 15 MOTION to conduct discovery. Signed by Judge John T. Copenhaver, Jr. on 10/4/2013. (cc: attys) (taq)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the West Virginia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: O'Dell v. Zurich American Insurance Company
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Gregory J. O'Dell
Represented By:	Anthony J. Cicconi
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Zurich American Insurance Company
Represented By:	Tiffany R. Durst
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?