McKinney v. Thomas et al
Amanda McKinney |
West Virginia Regional Jail and Correctional Facility Authority, Chief Correctional Officer Lt. Larry Bunting, Matthew Vandall, William Wilson, George Thomas and John Doe |
2:2013cv14403 |
June 14, 2013 |
US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
Charleston Office |
Kanawha |
John T. Copenhaver |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 104 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying without prejudice the plaintiff's 101 MOTION requesting leave to file in camera or under seal her response and the exhibits to defendant Thomas' 52 motion for summary judgment; the plaintiff is directed to submit a revised sealing request, taking into consideration the alternatives to sealing (such as redaction) for those portions of the documents for which confidentiality is unnecessary, and bearing in mind that sealing is the infrequ ent exception and not the rule; the sealing request to be submitted by 6/25/2014; plaintiff's response to Thomas' motion for summary judgment to remain provisionally sealed, pending the plaintiff's response to this order. Signed by Judge John T. Copenhaver, Jr. on 6/18/2014. (cc: attys) (taq) |
Filing 28 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting the 26 MOTION by John Doe to Dismiss Complaint Attached to 1 Notice of Removal; directing that the John Doe defendant(s) are dismissed from this action. Signed by Judge John T. Copenhaver, Jr. on 12/4/2013. (cc: attys; any unrepresented parties) (tmh) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.