Odom v. Cook Incorporated et al
| Judy Diann Odom |
| Cook Incorporated, Cook Biotech, Inc. and Cook Medical, Inc. |
| 2:2013cv30345 |
| November 26, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
| Charleston Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Joseph R. Goodwin |
| Personal Injury- Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
35
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER dismissing plaintiff's claims against defendants Cook Incorporated, Cook Biotech, Inc., and Cook Medical, LLC with prejudice; because no other defendants remain in the case, the plaintiff's case is closed and stricken from the docket. Signed by Judge Joseph R. Goodwin on 8/29/2017. (cc: plaintiff, via certified mail, return receipt requested; counsel of record) (brn)
|
|
Filing
31
ORDER Cook's motion to show cause is GRANTED and Cook's motion to dismiss is TAKEN UNDER ADVISEMENT; it is ORDERED that, within 30 days, the plaintiff pay Cook a $500.00 monetary sanction and show cause why her case should not be dismi ssed with prejudice; in the event the plaintiff does not pay Cook $500.00 and show cause within 30 days, the plaintiff's claims against Cook shall be dismissed with prejudice without further notice to the plaintiff. Signed by Judge Joseph R. Goodwin on 7/21/2017. (cc: counsel of record; plaintiff, via certified mail, return receipt requested) (hkl)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
