Brown et al v. CMH Manufacturing, Inc. et al
||Rosanna Brown and Larry Brown
||CMH Homes, Inc., CMH Manufacturing, Inc. and Vanderbilt Mortgage and Finance, Inc.
||December 6, 2013
||US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia
||John T. Copenhaver
|Nature of Suit:
||Contract Product Liability
|Cause of Action:
||28 U.S.C. § 1332
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|August 29, 2014
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER pursuant to defendants' 6 MOTION to compel arbitration; directing that the plaintiffs submit this case to arbitration in accordance with the terms of the Finance Agreement; this action is stayed and retired to the inactive docket pending the arbitral decision or abandonment of that forum and this action, whichever first occurs; counsel are directed to file joint status reports quarterly beginning 10/1/2014, respecting progress on the matter. Signed by Judge John T. Copenhaver, Jr. on 8/29/2014. (cc: attys; any unrepresented parties) (taq)
|July 2, 2014
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER granting the defendants' 30 MOTION for a protective order to stay discovery pending resolution of the defendants' 6 motion to compel arbitration; discovery is stayed pending resolution of the defendant s' motion to compel arbitration; granting the defendants' 35 MOTION to continue the scheduling order as specified herein; the deadlines imposed by the scheduling order in this case, to the extent those deadlines have not already passed, are continued pending resolution of the defendants motion to compel arbitration. Signed by Judge John T. Copenhaver, Jr. on 7/2/2014. (cc: attys; any unrepresented parties) (taq)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the West Virginia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?