Chumley v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
Janeen Chumley |
Ethicon, Inc. and Boston Scientific Corporation |
2:2014cv03978 |
January 22, 2014 |
US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
Charleston Office |
XX US, Outside State |
Joseph R. Goodwin |
Personal Injury- Product Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 18 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Ethicon's 15 MOTION to Dismiss With Prejudice is GRANTED in part as to the dismissal of Ethicon, Inc. with prejudice and because Boston Scientific Corp. remains a defendant in this action, Ethicon's Mo tion is otherwise DENIED; it is directed that within 14 days of entry of this order the plaintiff is to file an Amended Short Form Complaint using the Boston Scientific Corp. form and to file a Motion to Transfer MDLs. Signed by Judge Joseph R. Goodwin on 11/25/2015. (cc: counsel of record; any unrepresented party) (ts) |
Filing 13 ORDER denying 9 MOTION by Janeen Chumley to Dismiss. Denying 8 MOTION by Ethicon, Inc., Johnson & Johnson for Sanctions for failure to timely serve her Plaintiff Profile Form. The plaintiff has 30 business days from the entry of this Order to sub mit to Ethicon a completed PPF. Failure to comply with this Order will result in dismissal with prejudice upon motion by the defendant. Directing plaintiff's counsel send a copy of this Order to the plaintiff via certified mail, return receipt requested, and file a copy of the receipt. Signed by Judge Joseph R. Goodwin on 7/8/2015. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (skh) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.