Creel v. Hudson et al
Plaintiff: |
Kristopher D. Creel |
Defendant: |
Corporal Hudson, Blagg, Ramsey, Corporal Fernandez, Simpson, David Ballard and Jim Rubenstein |
Case Number: |
2:2014cv10648 |
Filed: |
October 1, 2014 |
Court: |
US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
Office: |
Charleston Office |
County: |
Fayette |
Presiding Judge: |
Thomas E. Johnston |
Presiding Judge: |
Dwane L. Tinsley |
Nature of Suit: |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
Cause of Action: |
42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Jury Demanded By: |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Date Filed |
Document Text |
September 12, 2017 |
Filing
78
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER the plaintiff's 77 objections are OVERRULED; adopting the 76 Proposed Findings and Recommendation by Magistrate Judge; granting in part and denying in part defendants' 56 Motion for Summary Judgment; th e Court ORDERS that Counts One and Two be DISMISSED in their entirety; Count Five is DISMISSED to the extent it concerns the incidents occurring on 5/6/2013 and 6/7/2013; Count Five is further DISMISSED as to Defendant Rubenstein; in all other r espects, defendants' motion is DENIED; denying plaintiff's 60 Motion for Summary Judgment; Count Four is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted; this matter will proceed to trial on t he claim alleged in Count Three as well as those alleged in Count Five, as pertaining to Defendant Ballard and the incident on 9/26/2013; a scheduling order will follow the entry of this Memorandum Opinion and Order. Signed by Judge Thomas E. Johnston on 9/12/2017. (cc: counsel of record; any unrepresented party) (taq)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the West Virginia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?