Cote et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
Dawn Cote and Normand Cote |
American Medical Systems, Inc. |
2:2014cv13868 |
April 2, 2014 |
US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
Charleston Office |
XX US, Outside State |
Joseph R. Goodwin |
Personal Injury- Product Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 15 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting 13 MOTION by American Medical Systems, Inc. to Dismiss, as more fully set forth herein. AMS is DISMISSED with prejudice. Signed by Judge Joseph R. Goodwin on 11/15/2016. (cc: counsel of record; plaintiffs, Dawn and Normand Cote, via certified mail, return receipt requested to 46 Sandstone Drive, Bedford, New Hampshire 03110) (kp) |
Filing 11 ORDER denying 10 MOTION by American Medical Systems, Inc. to Dismiss, as more fully set forth herein; the plaintiffs have 30 business days from the entry of this Order to submit a completed PPF to AMS; the plaintiffs are reminded that the PPF and other forms relevant to participating in this MDL are available at http://www.wvsd.uscourts.gov/MDL/amsinc/forms.html; information on where to submit the PPF is also available on the court's website; failure to comply with this Order may result in dismissal with prejudice upon motion by thedefendants. Signed by Judge Joseph R. Goodwin on 8/2/2016. (cc: counsel of record; plaintiffs via certified mail, return receipt requested) (bdr) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.