Stotts et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Terri Stotts and Richard Stotts
Defendant: Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Case Number: 2:2014cv22360
Filed: July 10, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia
Office: Charleston Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: Joseph R. Goodwin
Nature of Suit: Personal Inj. Prod. Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 7, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 21 ORDER The 18 MOTION by Ethicon, Inc., Johnson & Johnson for Sanctions re Plaintiffs' failure to timely serve Plaintiff Profile Form is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part; the plaintiffs have 30 business days from the entry of this Order to submit to Ethicon a completed PPF; the plaintiffs are reminded that the PPF and other forms relevant to participating in this MDL are available at www.wvsd.uscourts.gov/MDL/ethicon/forms.html; information on where to submit the PPF is also availa ble on the court's website; the plaintiffs are warned that failure to comply with this Order will result in sanctions and may result in dismissal with prejudice upon motion by the defendants. Signed by Judge Joseph R. Goodwin on 3/7/2016. (cc: counsel of record; plaintiff via certified mail, return receipt requested) (ts)
August 18, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER denying 10 MOTION by Ethicon, Inc., Johnson & Johnson for Sanctions for Failure to Timely Serve Plaintiff Profile Form, as more fully set forth herein. It is further ORDERED that the plaintiff has 30 business days from the entry of this Ord er to submit to Ethicon a completed PPF. Failure to comply with this Order will result in dismissal with prejudice upon motion by the defendant. Finally, it is ORDERED that plaintiff's counsel send a copy of this Order to the plaintiff via certified mail, return receipt requested, and file a copy of the receipt. Signed by Judge Joseph R. Goodwin on 8/18/2015. (cc: counsel of record; any unrepresented party) (ts)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the West Virginia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Stotts et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Terri Stotts
Represented By: Benjamin A. Bertram
Represented By: J. Scott Bertram
Represented By: Blair Bertram Matyszczyk
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Richard Stotts
Represented By: Benjamin A. Bertram
Represented By: J. Scott Bertram
Represented By: Blair Bertram Matyszczyk
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ethicon, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Johnson & Johnson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?