Curtis v. Close et al
| Michael Curtis |
| Justin Close, Jason Bragg, Brandon Leazure, David Ballard, Robert Rhodes and Jim Rubenstein |
| 2:2014cv24624 |
| April 29, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
| Charleston Office |
| Fayette |
| Joseph R. Goodwin |
| Dwane L. Tinsley |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
42
ORDER accepting and incorporating the 40 Proposed Findings and Recommendations by Magistrate Judge; granting the defendants' 37 Motion to Dismiss; dismissing with prejudice plaintiff's 2 Complaint; and directing this action be stricken from the docket. Signed by Judge Joseph R. Goodwin on 8/14/2017. (cc: counsel of record; any unrepresented party) (mks)
|
|
Filing
25
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER adopting and incorporating the 21 Proposed Findings and Recommendation by Magistrate Judge; denying as moot the plaintiff's 4 and 7 motions for preliminary injunctive relief and the claims for declaratory and injunctive relief made in his 2 Complaint; granting the defendants' 19 Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Official Capacity Claims; and dismissing the plaintiff's official capacity claims; directing this action to remain referred to Judge Tinsley for further proceedings. Signed by Judge Joseph R. Goodwin on 3/8/2016. (cc: plaintiff, pro se; Judge Tinsley; counsel of record; any unrepresented party) (taq)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
