Elkland Holdings, LLC v. Eagle Mining, LLC et al
Plaintiff: Elkland Holdings, LLC
Defendant: Eagle Mining, LLC, James E. Moore, Cheryl Davis and Davis & Burton Contractors, Inc.
Case Number: 2:2014cv27210
Filed: October 23, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia
Office: Charleston Office
County: Boone
Presiding Judge: Thomas E. Johnston
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 21, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 32 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting Elkland's 28 MOTION to Withdraw 22 APPLICATION by Elkland Holdings, LLC for Entry of Default by Clerk against Davis & Burton Contractors, Inc. filed by Elkland Holdings, LLC.; denying as moot Elkland 's 22 APPLICATION for Entry of Default by Clerk against Davis & Burton Contractors, Inc.; granting Elkland's 23 MOTION to Extend Deadline to File Responses to 18 MOTION by Cheryl Davis, James E. Moore to Dismiss 1 Complaint and 20 MOTION by Eagle Mining, LLC to Dismiss 1 Complaint and to Compel Arbitration to December 12, 2014; staying all proceedings in this action pending arbitration until further order of this Court; removing this case from the active docket. Signed by Judge Thomas E. Johnston on 8/21/2015. (cc: counsel of record; any unrepresented party) (tmh)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the West Virginia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Elkland Holdings, LLC v. Eagle Mining, LLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Elkland Holdings, LLC
Represented By: Jonathan L. Anderson
Represented By: Christopher M. Hohn
Represented By: Albert F. Sebok
Represented By: Roman P. Wuller
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Eagle Mining, LLC
Represented By: James S. Crockett, Jr.
Represented By: Gregory Joseph Haley
Represented By: J. Scott Sexton
Represented By: Scott A. Stephenson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: James E. Moore
Represented By: James S. Crockett, Jr.
Represented By: Gregory Joseph Haley
Represented By: J. Scott Sexton
Represented By: Scott A. Stephenson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Cheryl Davis
Represented By: James S. Crockett, Jr.
Represented By: Gregory Joseph Haley
Represented By: J. Scott Sexton
Represented By: Scott A. Stephenson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Davis & Burton Contractors, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?