BrickStreet Mutual Insurance Company v. Zurich American Insurance Company
| BrickStreet Mutual Insurance Company |
| Zurich American Insurance Company |
| 2:2015cv06172 |
| May 13, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
| Charleston Office |
| Kanawha |
| Joseph R. Goodwin |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
45
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER (Cross-Motions for Summary Judgment) granting plaintiff BrickStreet Mutual Insurance Company's 24 MOTION for Summary Judgment; and denying defendant Zurich American Insurance Company's 26 MOTION for Summ ary Judgment; the court GRANTS the relief sought in BrickStreet's Complaint and DECLARES that the defendant Zurich is obligated to share equally in the burden of paying workers' compensation benefits to Mr. Gutierrez for injuries he sust ained in a workplace injury on 1/5/2012; Zurich must reimburse BrickStreet for half of the amount of workers' compensation benefits BrickStreet has already paid to Mr. Gutierrez and share equally going forward. Signed by Judge Joseph R. Goodwin on 9/15/2016. (cc: counsel of record; any unrepresented party) (published on the court's website, www.wvsd.uscourts.gov).(taq)
|
|
Filing
13
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER (Defendant's Motion to Dismiss) denying the defendant's 7 MOTION to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Joseph R. Goodwin on 8/13/2015. (cc: counsel of record; any unrepresented party) (taq)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
