Stewart v. Ballard

Stewart v. Ballard

Defendant:	David Ballard
Petitioner:	Jeffrey Wayne Stewart
Case Number:	2:2015cv07650
Filed:	April 7, 2016
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia
Office:	Charleston Office
County:	Fayette
Presiding Judge:	Dwane L. Tinsley
Presiding Judge:	John T. Copenhaver
Nature of Suit:	General
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
September 12, 2018	Filing 45 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER directing (1) That the 38 Proposed Findings and Recommendation are adopted by the court and incorporated herein, (2) Respondent's 31 Motion for Summary Judgment is granted, (3) Petitioner's 2 Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 is hereby denied, and (4) This action is dismissed and stricken from the docket; petitioner must file any appeal within 30 days after entry of the Judgment in this action. Signed by Judge John T. Copenhaver, Jr. on 9/12/2018. (cc: petitioner; counsel of record; United States Magistrate Judge) (kp)
April 7, 2017	Filing 22 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER pursuant to the 19 objections; adopting and incorporating the 18 Proposed Findings and Recommendation by Magistrate Judge; Grounds 4 and 5(D) of the petition are dismissed; petitioner is instructed to file any r equest to sever his unexhausted claims and proceed with only his exhausted claims WITHIN 30 DAYS; and a ruling on respondent's 13 Motion to Dismiss is deferred accordingly. Signed by Judge John T. Copenhaver, Jr. on 4/7/2017. (cc: plaintiff; counsel of record; United States Magistrate Judge) (taq)

Date Filed

Document Text

September 12, 2018

Filing 45 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER directing (1) That the 38 Proposed Findings and Recommendation are adopted by the court and incorporated herein, (2) Respondent's 31 Motion for Summary Judgment is granted, (3) Petitioner's 2 Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 is hereby denied, and (4) This action is dismissed and stricken from the docket; petitioner must file any appeal within 30 days after entry of the Judgment in this action. Signed by Judge John T. Copenhaver, Jr. on 9/12/2018. (cc: petitioner; counsel of record; United States Magistrate Judge) (kp)

April 7, 2017

Filing 22 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER pursuant to the 19 objections; adopting and incorporating the 18 Proposed Findings and Recommendation by Magistrate Judge; Grounds 4 and 5(D) of the petition are dismissed; petitioner is instructed to file any r equest to sever his unexhausted claims and proceed with only his exhausted claims WITHIN 30 DAYS; and a ruling on respondent's 13 Motion to Dismiss is deferred accordingly. Signed by Judge John T. Copenhaver, Jr. on 4/7/2017. (cc: plaintiff; counsel of record; United States Magistrate Judge) (taq)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the West Virginia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Stewart v. Ballard
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Jeffrey Wayne Stewart
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: David Ballard
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?