Aliff v. West Virginia Regional Jail and Correctional Facility Authority et al
| Kenneth Aliff |
| West Virginia Regional Jail and Correctional Facility Authority, Austin G. Burke, Travis Crook, Daniel Simons and John Doe Correctional Officers/Special Response Team Members |
| 2:2015cv13513 |
| September 28, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
| Charleston Office |
| Kanawha |
| Thomas E. Johnston |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
59
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting in part Defendant Austin Burke's 7 Motion to Dismiss and Defendant Travis Crook's 14 MOTION to Dismiss insofar as they request dismissal of Plaintiff's federal claims; the Court DISMISSES a ll of Plaintiff's federal claims against all defendants named in the Amended Complaint; in the absence of any federal claims to confer jurisdiction in this case, the Court DECLINES to exercise its supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiff 9;s remaining state law claims; and REMANDS this matter to the Circuit Court of Kanawha County, West Virginia; directing this matter removed from the Court's docket. Signed by Judge Thomas E. Johnston on 9/26/2016. (cc: counsel of record; any unrepresented party; Clerk, Circuit Court of Kanawha County, West Virginia) (taq)
|
|
Filing
30
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying Plaintiff's 21 MOTION to Extend Time Limit for Service. Signed by Judge Thomas E. Johnston on 1/20/2016. (cc: counsel of record; any unrepresented party) (tmh)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
