Dillon v. Colvin

Dillon v. Colvin

Plaintiff:	Barry Jason Dillon
Defendant:	Carolyn W. Colvin
Case Number:	2:2016cv04330
Filed:	May 11, 2016
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia
Office:	Charleston Office
County:	Mingo
Presiding Judge:	Thomas E. Johnston
Nature of Suit:	Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
September 14, 2017	Filing 23 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER accepting and incorporating the 22 Proposed Findings and Recommendation by Magistrate Judge; denying plaintiff's 20 request for summary judgment; granting defendant's 21 request to affirm the decision of the Commissioner; affirming the final decision of the Commissioner; and dismissing this action from the docket of the Court, consistent with the findings and recommendations. Signed by Judge Robert C. Chambers on 9/14/2017. (cc: counsel of record; any unrepresented parties) (taq)
March 28, 2017	Filing 13 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting Defendant's 5 Partial Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; Count I of Plaintiff's Complaint regarding the declaratory action is DISMISSED; whether the Administrative Law Judge relie d on substantial evidence in the decision to terminate Plaintiff's benefits remains pending; the Court DIRECTS the Clerk to refer the remaining claim to the magistrate judge pursuant to this Court's Standing Order. Signed by Judge Robert C. Chambers on 3/28/2017. (cc: counsel of record; any unrepresented parties) (taq)

Date Filed

Document Text

September 14, 2017

Filing 23 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER accepting and incorporating the 22 Proposed Findings and Recommendation by Magistrate Judge; denying plaintiff's 20 request for summary judgment; granting defendant's 21 request to affirm the decision of the Commissioner; affirming the final decision of the Commissioner; and dismissing this action from the docket of the Court, consistent with the findings and recommendations. Signed by Judge Robert C. Chambers on 9/14/2017. (cc: counsel of record; any unrepresented parties) (taq)

March 28, 2017

Filing 13 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting Defendant's 5 Partial Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; Count I of Plaintiff's Complaint regarding the declaratory action is DISMISSED; whether the Administrative Law Judge relie d on substantial evidence in the decision to terminate Plaintiff's benefits remains pending; the Court DIRECTS the Clerk to refer the remaining claim to the magistrate judge pursuant to this Court's Standing Order. Signed by Judge Robert C. Chambers on 3/28/2017. (cc: counsel of record; any unrepresented parties) (taq)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the West Virginia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Dillon v. Colvin
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Barry Jason Dillon
Represented By:	Michael T. Hogan
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Represented By:	Eric P. Kressman
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?