Jimmy A. Dunn Excavating Company v. Eagle Pipeline, LLC

Justia Dockets & Filings Fourth Circuit West Virginia Southern District Jimmy A. Dunn Excavating Company v. Eagle Pipeline, LLC

Jimmy A. Dunn Excavating Company v. Eagle Pipeline, LLC

Plaintiff:	Jimmy A. Dunn Excavating Company
Defendant:	Eagle Pipeline, LLC
Case Number:	2:2016cv04409
Filed:	May 16, 2016
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia
Office:	Charleston Office
County:	Kanawha
Presiding Judge:	Thomas E. Johnston
Nature of Suit:	Other Contract
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
April 15, 2020	Filing 56 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting the 54 Motion to File Sur-Reply and denying the 49 Motion to Allow for Discovery on Non-Party, as more fully set forth herein. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dwane L. Tinsley on 4/15/2020. (cc: counsel of record; any unrepresented party) (kew)
July 1, 2019	Filing 39 ORDER granting 34 MOTION by Jimmy A. Dunn Excavating Company to Compel Enforcement of Suggestion Against Columbia Pipeline Group Services, LLC, to the extent that it requests an order requiring Columbia to respond to the summons; directing the Clerk to issue a revised summons commanding Columbia to respond in accordance with state law and to return the revised summons to Plaintiff for service on Columbia; further directing Columbia to respond to the revised summons as if it were issued on 7/17/2017; Plaintiff's request for fees and costs associated with making the motion is DENIED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dwane L. Tinsley on 7/1/2019. (cc: attys) (ts)

Date Filed

Document Text

April 15, 2020

Filing 56 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting the 54 Motion to File Sur-Reply and denying the 49 Motion to Allow for Discovery on Non-Party, as more fully set forth herein. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dwane L. Tinsley on 4/15/2020. (cc: counsel of record; any unrepresented party) (kew)

July 1, 2019

Filing 39 ORDER granting 34 MOTION by Jimmy A. Dunn Excavating Company to Compel Enforcement of Suggestion Against Columbia Pipeline Group Services, LLC, to the extent that it requests an order requiring Columbia to respond to the summons; directing the Clerk to issue a revised summons commanding Columbia to respond in accordance with state law and to return the revised summons to Plaintiff for service on Columbia; further directing Columbia to respond to the revised summons as if it were issued on 7/17/2017; Plaintiff's request for fees and costs associated with making the motion is DENIED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dwane L. Tinsley on 7/1/2019. (cc: attys) (ts)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the West Virginia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jimmy A. Dunn Excavating Company v. Eagle Pipeline, LLC
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jimmy A. Dunn Excavating Company
Represented By:	Michael J. Del Giudice
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Eagle Pipeline, LLC
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?