Babcock v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
| Lisa A. Babcock |
| Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson |
| 2:2016cv05114 |
| June 6, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
| Charleston Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Joseph R. Goodwin |
| Personal Injury- Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
27
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER re: 15 MOTION by Wes Scott Larsen to Withdraw as Attorney for on behalf of Lisa A. Babcock and 18 MOTION by Ethicon, Inc., Johnson & Johnson to Dismiss Non-Pelvic Mesh Cases Without Prejudice; the parties are DIRECTED t o confer by no later than 8/03/2018 to determine the appropriate venue for this case, and to submit a joint venue recommendation to the court by 8/10/2018; this action is STAYED until 8/10/2018 to allow plaintiff to retain other counsel; plaintiff is DIRECTED to file a statement of intent to proceed without counsel or to have new counsel enter an appearance by 8/10/2018; if the plaintiff fails to do so, the Defendants may move the court for appropriate relief, including dismissal with prejudice; the 18 MOTION by Ethicon, Inc., Johnson & Johnson to Dismiss Non-Pelvic Mesh Cases Without Prejudice is DENIED; the Clerk is DIRECTED to remove this case from Ethicon Wave 8 and lift the 2327 Wave 8 flag from the docket sheet. Signed by Judge Joseph R. Goodwin on 7/3/2018. (cc: counsel of record; plaintiff Lisa A. Babcock, via certified mail, return receipt requested) (kp)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
