Chafin v. West Virginia Division of Juvenile Services et al
| Christopher Lee Chafin |
| West Virginia Industrial Home for Youth and West Virginia Division of Juvenile Services |
| 2:2016cv05127 |
| May 26, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
| Charleston Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Dwane L. Tinsley |
| John T. Copenhaver |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
41
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER adopting and incorporating the 39 Proposed Findings and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge and granting the defendants' 38 motion to dismiss; directing that the plaintiff's complaint is dismissed. Signed by Judge John T. Copenhaver, Jr. on 12/21/2018. (cc: plaintiff; counsel of record; United States Magistrate Judge) (taq)
|
|
Filing
31
ORDER adopting and incorporating the 29 Proposed Findings and Recommendation by Magistrate Judge; 15 Motion by West Virginia Division of Juvenile Services, West Virginia Industrial Home for Youth, to dismiss is granted; the West Virgin ia Division of Juvenile Services and the West Virginia Industrial Home for Youth are dismissed from this action. The matter continues to be referred to Magistrate Judge Tinsley for further proceedings as to the unknown individual defendants. Signed by Judge John T. Copenhaver, Jr. on 2/28/2018. (cc: plaintiff; counsel of record; United States Magistrate Judge Dwane L. Tinsley) (taq)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
