Miller v. Rubenstein et al
Plaintiff: Andre Miller
Defendant: Jim Rubenstein, David Ballard, Christopher Wynegar and Hobert Allen
Case Number: 2:2016cv05637
Filed: August 25, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia
Office: Charleston Office
County: Fayette
Presiding Judge: Thomas E. Johnston
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 6, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 145 ORDER granting in part and denying in part the 90 , 92 , 96 motion for summary judgment; granting in part the 90 MOTION by David Ballard, Jim Rubenstein for Summary Judgment, 92 MOTION by Christopher Wynegar for Summary Judgment, and 96 MOTION by Hobert Allen for Summary Judgment insofar as they request dismissal of Miller's claims regarding Defendant Wynegar's alleged use of zip-ties and racial slurs and Defendant Allen's alleged threatening and assa ult of Miller; denying in part Defendants Rubenstein's and Ballard's 90 motion insofar as it requests judgment as a matter of law on Defendant's Eighth Amendment and supervisory liability claims, qualified immunity as to all of Miller's claims, and a dismissal as to Miller's claim for injunctive relief; denying in part Defendant Wynegar's 92 motion insofar as it asserts that Miller could not use his deposition to rebut summary judgment; and denying in part Defendant Allen's 96 motion insofar as it requests judgment as a matter of law on Miller's Eighth Amendment and state law claims and asserts qualified immunity as to all of Miller's claims; the claims against all three Def endants shall proceed only insofar as they relate to Miller's exhausted claims; denying as moot 94 MOTION by Hobert Allen to file exhibits under seal. Signed by Judge Thomas E. Johnston on 2/6/2018. (cc: counsel of record; any unrepresented party) (taq)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the West Virginia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Miller v. Rubenstein et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Andre Miller
Represented By: Aaron D. Moss
Represented By: Jennifer S. Wagner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jim Rubenstein
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: David Ballard
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Christopher Wynegar
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Hobert Allen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?